From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <archer-return-1965-listarch-archer=sourceware.org@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 28072 invoked by alias); 14 May 2010 21:58:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact archer-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Sender: <archer@sourceware.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:archer@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:archer-help@sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:archer-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Id: <archer.sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 28058 invoked by uid 22791); 14 May 2010 21:58:02 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0
	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Patch for pascal-dynamic arrays
From: Joost van der Sluis <joost@cnoc.nl>
To: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Cc: Project Archer <archer@sourceware.org>
In-Reply-To: <20100506230504.GA21919@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net>
References: <1252939529.28930.33.camel@wsjoost.cnoc.lan>
	 <20090916154453.GA23913@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net>
	 <1254326374.2755.14.camel@wsjoost.cnoc.lan>
	 <20091004141705.GA18527@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net>
	 <1256751286.31305.24.camel@wsjoost.cnoc.lan>
	 <20091030094726.GA29758@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net>
	 <1257630529.27675.26.camel@wsjoost.cnoc.lan>
	 <1271071502.27845.15.camel@wsjoost.cnoc.lan>
	 <20100412195106.GA32767@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net>
	 <1271241292.21465.18.camel@wsjoost.cnoc.lan>
	 <20100506230504.GA21919@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 21:58:00 -0000
Message-Id: <1273874250.9996.33.camel@wsjoost.cnoc.lan>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Language-Detected: en
X-Spam-Scanned: InterNLnet Mail Scan System V2.03
X-SW-Source: 2010-q2/txt/msg00021.txt.bz2

On Fri, 2010-05-07 at 01:05 +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 12:34:52 +0200, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 21:51 +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> > > Going to try some alternative adjustment of this part.
> > 
> > Another approach could be to do a full check_typedef before the
> > code-block above. But then the OBJECT_ADDRESS (as used by check_typedef
> > to evaluate all dynamic properties) has to be set to the right
> > (=value_data_address) value. Iirc I've already tried that in an earlier
> > patch I've send.
> 
> Attached patch should match it I hope.  It is on top of gdb-7.1-18.fc13.

I can't apply it. I'm not sure where to get the code of
'gdb-7.1-18.fc3'. I've tried fedora-cvs (cvs co gdb -r gdb-7_1-18_fc13)
and then in F-13: make x86_64. Then cd gdb-7.1 and applied the patch.
But there are more hunks failing then succeeding.

It also doesn't work on any archer-branch which sounds logical to me. So
how can I use it?

Joost.