From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14471 invoked by alias); 25 Feb 2009 14:47:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact archer-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Sender: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Received: (qmail 14456 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Feb 2009 14:47:45 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 14:47:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Tom Tromey Cc: archer@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [delayed-symfile] [commit] Fix a regression on delayed retrieving of the unwinding debug info. Message-ID: <20090225144734.GA2115@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> References: <20090224231429.GC23254@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-SW-Source: 2009-q1/txt/msg00243.txt.bz2 On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 02:47:20 +0100, Tom Tromey wrote: > I know you have limited time to work on your own major patches, so if > you find bugs like this, feel free to just push them back to the > branch author for fixing. It is ok to do this publicly. If the > branch author can't get to the bug in a timely way, we can work > something out. > > It is also ok by me if you also want to just fix the bugs like you did > this time. I just want to make sure that you don't feel trapped into > doing this. I was close to push the branch back to you but fortunately it got regression-free before that in this case. The fixing was fine for me. Regards, Jan