From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26619 invoked by alias); 4 Aug 2009 20:58:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact archer-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Sender: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Received: (qmail 26609 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Aug 2009 20:58:50 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,J_CHICKENPOX_33,J_CHICKENPOX_83,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org From: Thiago Jung Bauermann To: Tom Tromey Subject: Re: [2/2][RFA][7.0] Rename Python testcase files to be 8.3 safe Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 20:58:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.4 (Linux/2.6.30-1-amd64; KDE/4.2.4; x86_64; ; ) Cc: archer@sourceware.org References: <200908022312.24718.thiago.bauermann@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200908041800.04823.thiago.bauermann@gmail.com> X-SW-Source: 2009-q3/txt/msg00097.txt.bz2 Em Segunda-feira 03 Agosto 2009 14:52:57 Tom Tromey escreveu: > >>>>> "Thiago" == Thiago Jung Bauermann > >>>>> writes: > > Thiago> # renamed: testsuite/gdb.python/python-mi.exp -> > testsuite/gdb.python/mi.exp > > It is actually useful to have all .exp files have a globally unique > name. That way you can run just a single file by passing its basename > to runtest. > > I didn't check to see if any of these basenames clash -- but they seem a > bit generic. > > So, how about py-mi.exp? I forgot to mention that before I submitted the patch, I verified that % make check RUNTESTFLAGS=gdb.python/foo.exp works as expected, even if there's a foo.exp somewhere else (i.e., that other foo.exp will not be run). Do you still prefer unique basenames? > Otherwise it is all fine by me. I'll hold on this patch while I see what should be done regarding the gdb/python/*.[ch] files. I'm not liking fnchange.lst much, will have to raise this topic upstream... -- []'s Thiago Jung Bauermann