From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13025 invoked by alias); 12 Dec 2009 00:06:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact archer-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Sender: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Received: (qmail 13015 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Dec 2009 00:06:06 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 00:06:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Tom Tromey Cc: Cary Coutant , Dodji Seketeli , GDB/Archer list Subject: Re: [RFC] Proposal for a new DWARF name index section Message-ID: <20091212000600.GA17940@caradoc.them.org> References: <4A7FE28D.4050901@redhat.com> <4A8D8868.3010302@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SW-Source: 2009-q4/txt/msg00094.txt.bz2 On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 04:56:02PM -0700, Tom Tromey wrote: > It occurred to me today that we could define a GNU-local attribute that > GCC (and whatever DWARF-rewriting tool we come up with to generate the > indices post-facto) can put into the CU DIE. > > What do you think of that? Sounds better than producer-grubbing to me. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery