public inbox for archer@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
To: Joost van der Sluis <joost@cnoc.nl>
Cc: archer@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Size of DW_FORM_ref_addr in DWARF 3 and the archer-jankratochvil-fedora13 branch
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 17:39:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100429173916.GA6347@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1271777933.28610.63.camel@wsjoost.cnoc.lan>

On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 17:38:53 +0200, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
> Since Dwarf 3 the length of a DW_FORM_ref_addr entry is not dependent on
> the pointer size of the target platform, but on the used Dwarf-format
> (32 bit or 64 bit) for the current compilation section.

This is a HEAD patch

commit e3fa87d5f376db4523a844acc01199785d11b582
Author: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu Mar 4 22:01:09 2010 +0000

        * dwarf2read.c (skip_one_die) <DW_FORM_ref_addr>: Use offset size
        in DWARF 3 and later.
        (read_attribute_value) <DW_FORM_ref_addr>: Likewise.

checked-in after gdb_7_1-branch has been created but still before the 7.1
release by:

commit c6c011eebb4006a89d4344864f560762f0aa45f3
Author: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri Mar 5 15:37:33 2010 +0000

        * dwarf2read.c (skip_one_die) <DW_FORM_ref_addr>: Use offset size
        in DWARF 3 and later.
        (read_attribute_value) <DW_FORM_ref_addr>: Likewise.


> When I load a project with Dwarf-3 debug information with fsf-gdb head,
> it works. But not with the archer-jankratochvil-fedora13 branch. That
> version assumes that the length of a DW_FORM_ref_addr on 64 bit is
> always 64 bits, which is not the case.

It works with FSF GDB HEAD, FSF GDB 7.1 and Fedora-13 gdb-7.1.
It does not work with archer-jankratochvil-fedora13 as it is just an
intermediate step for Fedora-13 gdb-7.1.

Tried now to merge archer-jankratochvil-fedora13 with gdb_7_1-branch but there
is a problem it would need changes for the FSF-accepted using-directive
patchset.  One cannot cheerry-pick the patch as diff against gdb_7_1-branch
would then clash on that patch duplicity with FSF 7.1 release.


> Is it planned to merge this fix from fsf-gdb to
> archer-jankratochvil-fedora13? How is this normally handled?

archer-jankratochvil-fedora13 is now probably completely frozen (=dead) as
I already add rather patches directly to the F-13 CVS.  One cannot change F-13
much as it is far in its release cycle.

There should be some archer-jankratochvil-fedora14 branch created soon
(=roughly in about two months).  I have to admit there is currently no fresh
Archer-merged branch.


Thanks,
Jan

  reply	other threads:[~2010-04-29 17:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-20 15:39 Joost van der Sluis
2010-04-29 17:39 ` Jan Kratochvil [this message]
2010-05-02 19:54   ` Joost van der Sluis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100429173916.GA6347@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net \
    --to=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
    --cc=archer@sourceware.org \
    --cc=joost@cnoc.nl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).