From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26872 invoked by alias); 14 Jun 2010 10:17:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact archer-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Sender: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Received: (qmail 26846 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Jun 2010 10:17:44 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 10:17:00 -0000 From: Jakub Jelinek To: Tom Tromey Cc: Dodji Seketeli , Project Archer Subject: Re: Fedora 14 debug proposal Message-ID: <20100611194740.GD7811@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com> Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-12-10) X-SW-Source: 2010-q2/txt/msg00050.txt.bz2 On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 02:31:44PM -0600, Tom Tromey wrote: > >>>>> "Tom" == Tom Tromey writes: > > Dodji> I guess at worst, upstream will require a flag to get the > Dodji> .debug_{pug,aranges,pubnames,pubtypes} section back for a little > Dodji> while before removing the code completely? > > Tom> I wouldn't bother with an option, but then I'm not very concerned about > Tom> whether this particular change goes upstream. Of course, that is easy > Tom> for me to say -- I will do whatever Jakub thinks is best here. > > On irc, Jakub asked for this to be sent upstream, just to see if they > would accept it. I'm struggling through a regtest, you'll see it on > gcc-patches "soon". I guess everybody is struggling with bootstraps/regtests lately, apparently every second patch or so from Honza lately causes a bootstrap failure or some regression, really wonder what kind of testing he does on his patches if any. Jakub