From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9317 invoked by alias); 30 Jun 2010 18:14:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact archer-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Sender: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Received: (qmail 9299 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Jun 2010 18:14:45 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,TW_YM,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Roland McGrath To: Tom Tromey Cc: Project Archer , pmatilai@redhat.com Subject: Re: find-debuginfo.sh change for gdb index In-Reply-To: Tom Tromey's message of Wednesday, 30 June 2010 10:28:55 -0600 References: <20100629232147.C019548255@magilla.sf.frob.com> Message-Id: <20100630181436.518364C33C@magilla.sf.frob.com> Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 18:14:00 -0000 X-SW-Source: 2010-q2/txt/msg00065.txt.bz2 > Roland> I don't quite understand what file this writes to. > Roland> Is it implicitly ".index" in the argument directory? > > Yes. Ok. IMHO it would be better if the command just took the output file name explicitly. But whatever. > Roland> IMHO, the file name should have "gdb" in the name. > Roland> This is really not any very generic sort of index for the information. > > Ok. What do you think of just ".gdb as the suffix? I don't object, though I'd go with something like '.gdb-index' instead. Thanks, Roland