From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2795 invoked by alias); 26 Jul 2010 16:06:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact archer-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Sender: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Received: (qmail 2773 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Jul 2010 16:06:29 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 16:06:00 -0000 From: Oleg Nesterov To: Roland McGrath Cc: archer@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Q: multiple inferiors, all-stop && vCont Message-ID: <20100726160358.GA21742@redhat.com> References: <20100716205147.GA26313@redhat.com> <20100721170400.GA30978@redhat.com> <20100721204203.D040C400B6@magilla.sf.frob.com> <20100723173134.GA29717@redhat.com> <20100726142759.GA17171@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100726142759.GA17171@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-SW-Source: 2010-q3/txt/msg00061.txt.bz2 On 07/26, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > Right now I am trying to understand why gdb doesn't use 'vCont:c' > but sends 'c' instead. And yes, I report 'vCont;c;t' to 'vCont?'. OK. After I read remote_vcont_resume()->remote_vcont_probe() path I understand why 'vCont;c;t' doesn't work. Contrary to what the documentation says it is all or nothing. Except 't' has the separate remote_state->support_vCont_t flag. Very strange. Oleg.