public inbox for archer@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: archer@sourceware.org, utrace-devel@redhat.com
Subject: Re: gdbstub initial code, v8 && ptrace
Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2010 21:02:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100906205927.GA30471@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100906194229.GA27405@redhat.com>

On 09/06, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> OK, I am stupid. Indeed, say, "return UTRACE_STOP | UTRACE_SIGNAL_IGN"
> from under "case UTRACE_SIGNAL_REPORT" changes utrace_report->result,
> and confuses other tracers.
>
> Probably we can ignore ptrace, but this also means ugdb conflicts
> with itself and should be fixed.

Yes.

I am a bit confused... OK, ugdb is wrong wrt multitracing.
UTRACE_SIGNAL_REPORT case shouldn't return "UTRACE_STOP | UTRACE_SIGNAL_IGN",
it should return "UTRACE_STOP | UTRACE_SIGNAL_REPORT" to keep report->result.
But it needs to return UTRACE_SIGNAL_DELIVER?

Probably we can check orig_ka != NULL and treat orig_ka == NULL as
UTRACE_SIGNAL_REPORT. Hopefully this can't be confused with
UTRACE_SIGNAL_HANDLER.

Not sure about UTRACE_SIGNAL_HOLD, but this is very unlikely race.

I need to re-read utrace_get_signal() with a fresh head.

Oleg.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-09-06 21:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-03 22:44 gdbstub initial code, v8 Oleg Nesterov
2010-09-05 19:41 ` Jan Kratochvil
2010-09-06 18:21   ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-09-06 18:31     ` Jan Kratochvil
2010-09-06 20:48       ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-09-07  2:59         ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2010-09-08 19:24           ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-09-10 10:02           ` Roland McGrath
2010-09-06 18:27 ` gdbstub initial code, v8 && ptrace Oleg Nesterov
2010-09-06 19:45   ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-09-06 21:02     ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2010-09-10 10:10       ` Roland McGrath
2010-09-10 19:10         ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-10-13  7:14           ` Roland McGrath
2010-10-15 13:57             ` Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100906205927.GA30471@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=archer@sourceware.org \
    --cc=utrace-devel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).