From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15458 invoked by alias); 22 Sep 2010 23:48:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact archer-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Sender: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Received: (qmail 15448 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Sep 2010 23:48:19 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 23:48:00 -0000 From: Oleg Nesterov To: "Frank Ch. Eigler" Cc: archer@sourceware.org, utrace-devel@redhat.com Subject: Re: gdbstub initial code, v11 Message-ID: <20100922234442.GA13379@redhat.com> References: <20100922022226.GA27400@redhat.com> <20100922231451.GA11198@redhat.com> <20100922233909.GF2727@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100922233909.GF2727@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-SW-Source: 2010-q3/txt/msg00216.txt.bz2 On 09/22, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 01:14:51AM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > > > When I do 'watch', gdb sends '$Z2'. I am a bit confused, iirc it > > was decided I shouldn't play with Z packets now. But I won't > > argue. > > There are Z packets and then there are Z packets. The ones Roland > told you not to worry about are Z0/Z1 related to (code) breakpoints, > which should be implemented via uprobes at some point. > > The ones I'm talking about are Z2/Z3 for (data) watchpoints. Ah, OK, thanks. I'll try to understand how this works. Oleg.