From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24345 invoked by alias); 8 Oct 2010 00:23:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact archer-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Sender: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Received: (qmail 24335 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Oct 2010 00:23:00 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2010 00:23:00 -0000 From: Oleg Nesterov To: Pedro Alves Cc: archer@sourceware.org, utrace-devel@redhat.com Subject: Re: BUG: gdb && notification packets (Was: gdbstub initial code, v12) Message-ID: <20101008001857.GA22461@redhat.com> References: <20100930182320.GA17475@redhat.com> <201010061932.31628.pedro@codesourcery.com> <20101007225922.GA18085@redhat.com> <201010080103.43718.pedro@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201010080103.43718.pedro@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-SW-Source: 2010-q4/txt/msg00010.txt.bz2 On 10/08, Pedro Alves wrote: > > On Thursday 07 October 2010 23:59:22, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > Hmm. Not sure I understand this... gdb could issue a series of Hc+c > > after s to do "step a thread and resume all others". > > > > But this doesn't matter. Obviously vCont is better and more handy. > > Not in all-stop mode. Ah indeed. I missed you mentioned "This was added way before non-stop" later. Oleg.