From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5718 invoked by alias); 14 Jan 2011 15:22:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact archer-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Sender: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Received: (qmail 5699 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Jan 2011 15:22:45 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 15:22:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Sami Wagiaalla Cc: Keith Seitz , archer@sourceware.org Subject: [expr-cumulative] testsuite: Status of the tests upstreaming Message-ID: <20110114152234.GA18855@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SW-Source: 2011-q1/txt/msg00016.txt.bz2 Hi Sami, while cross-checking testsuite results I found that some testcase were renamed between [expr-cumulative] and upstream: gdb.cp/ koenig.exp -> namespace-koenig.exp namespace-multiple-imports.exp -> nsimport.exp namespace-nested-imports.exp (*) -> (not sure) namespace-nested-import.exp namespace-no-imports.exp (*) -> (not found, dropped?) namespace-recursive.exp -> nsrecurs.exp namespace-stress-declarations.exp -> nsdecl.exp namespace-stress.exp -> nsstress.exp realcpp.exp -> cpexprs.exp shadowing.exp -> shadow.exp Could you comment on the two marked items if the change+drop is valid or if they were forgotten and also whether it is a good sanity check for Fedora to still include their Archer variants? Thanks, Jan