From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22674 invoked by alias); 24 Jan 2011 18:12:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact archer-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Sender: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Received: (qmail 22664 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Jan 2011 18:12:39 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 18:12:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: sami wagiaalla Cc: Keith Seitz , archer@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [expr-cumulative] testsuite: Status of the tests upstreaming Message-ID: <20110124181230.GA22988@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net> References: <20110114152234.GA18855@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <4D3DAFEA.2080701@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D3DAFEA.2080701@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SW-Source: 2011-q1/txt/msg00022.txt.bz2 Hi Sami, On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 17:59:22 +0100, sami wagiaalla wrote: > > namespace-nested-imports.exp (*) -> (not sure) namespace-nested-import.exp > > This correct. The test has not been renamed to make it 8.3 compatible. The renaming applies to the other testcases. But this specific namespace-nested-import{,s}.exp testfile has very different content - so I was not sure if it really tests what the former test did test. If the rename rule applies even in this case then sure everything is OK. Thanks, Jan