Re: [Archer] Re: [Archer] Question about archer branch managment

[Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>]

> > Hmmm, I thought that 
> > 
> >         $ git push origin archer-tromey-explosion-project
> > 
> > would have worked right from the get go...
> 
> Really not:

(I don't know if I'm the only one feeling that way, but your style
is insanely compact for my brain - it often takes a long time to
understand what you're trying to say sometimes)

> 	$ rm -rf 1 2;mkdir 1 2;cd 1;git init;touch f;git add f;git commit -m f f;cd ..;git clone 1 2;cd 2;git checkout -b x;git push origin    ;cd ../1;git branch;cd ..
> 	Switched to a new branch 'x'
> 	Everything up-to-date
> 	* master
> but
> 	$ rm -rf 1 2;mkdir 1 2;cd 1;git init;touch f;git add f;git commit -m f f;cd ..;git clone 1 2;cd 2;git checkout -b x;git push origin x:x;cd ../1;git branch;cd ..
> 	Switched to a new branch 'x'
> 	Total 0 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0)
> 	To /tmp/gittest3/1
> 	 * [new branch]      x -> x
> 	* master
> 	  x

I think I didn't express myself clearly. All I was trying to say is
that "x:x" in a "git push" command is equivalent to "x".  I wasn't
understanding the reasoning behind the instructions, but maybe I was
missing something, or making the wrong assumption somewhere (I was
assuming that Pierre named both local and remote branches with
the same name).

-- 
Joel