From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19257 invoked by alias); 7 Mar 2012 00:11:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact archer-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Sender: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Received: (qmail 19241 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Mar 2012 00:11:36 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 00:11:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Keith Seitz Cc: archer@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [Archer] Re: [Archer] Re: [Archer] Re: [Archer] Stop the Insanity! Linespec Rewrite Message-ID: <20120307001119.GU2867@adacore.com> References: <4F501EC1.3050104@redhat.com> <20120302190658.GH2867@adacore.com> <4F514E30.7070400@redhat.com> <20120306173945.GP2867@adacore.com> <4F564C6F.60001@redhat.com> <4F56671E.4000905@redhat.com> <20120306215019.GQ2867@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120306215019.GQ2867@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SW-Source: 2012-q1/txt/msg00024.txt.bz2 > I do not think so. That was fast! I will make sure to update my > sources and test again ASAP, hopefully this evening or tomorrow. And I can now confirm that all issues detected by our testsuite have been taken care of without introducing new regressions. So, the only change of behavior is the fact that the breakpoint command now accepts the "TASK" keyword in addition to "task". Personally, I don't think it's a problem. So, it's just a matter of deciding whether we want to start supporting it or not. Food for thoughts: It could seem to be friendlier to accept it, but I don't see that as a real advantage in practice. Perhaps it's easier in terms of the code. But on the other, once we start supporting it, we could be stuck with it... -- Joel