From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9284 invoked by alias); 13 Feb 2013 12:53:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact archer-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Sender: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Received: (qmail 9275 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Feb 2013 12:53:44 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 12:53:00 -0000 From: Gary Benson To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: Tom Tromey , Project Archer Subject: Re: Proposal to change branch maintenance Message-ID: <20130213125333.GD5023@blade.wire.rat> Mail-Followup-To: Jan Kratochvil , Tom Tromey , Project Archer References: <874nhipla5.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20130213121556.GA21353@host2.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130213121556.GA21353@host2.jankratochvil.net> X-SW-Source: 2013-q1/txt/msg00004.txt.bz2 Jan Kratochvil wrote: > On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 22:56:18 +0100, Tom Tromey wrote: > > So, new branches would be like "tromey/project" rather than the > > current "archer-tromey-project". > > > > I don't propose renaming existing branches. > > IMO if there should be a different naming the existing should be > renamed, otherwise it is more complicated/mess than it was. Deleting dead branches would make this easier, of course. Cheers, Gary -- http://gbenson.net/