From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25750 invoked by alias); 17 Mar 2009 21:56:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact archer-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Sender: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Received: (qmail 25740 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Mar 2009 21:56:23 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <49C01C7C.8020503@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 21:56:00 -0000 From: Phil Muldoon User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jan Kratochvil CC: Tom Tromey , archer@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Dead branches deletion? [Re: [expr]-fix [jk-expr-committed] Fix crash on C++ DW_AT_name "".] References: <20090315182943.GA17211@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <20090317214352.GB15790@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> In-Reply-To: <20090317214352.GB15790@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2009-q1/txt/msg00392.txt.bz2 Jan Kratochvil wrote: > On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 22:20:44 +0100, Tom Tromey wrote: > >> (Though I see on the wiki that this is listed as a dead branch... is >> that accurate?) >> > > Is there any reason to keep the `Dead Branches' wiki section and not just > delete those branches to make the `git branch -r | grep archer' listing > easier? Although CVS can also delete the branches while is is usual to keep > them in the repositories. > I'd rather keep mine around. Though from a purely personal point of view, I don't mind/care what people do to their own dead branches. But I like to keep history around. I learn from it when I forget things ;) Regards Phil