From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14140 invoked by alias); 3 Nov 2009 13:49:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact archer-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Sender: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Received: (qmail 14130 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Nov 2009 13:49:13 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4AF034D3.70204@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2009 13:49:00 -0000 From: Phil Muldoon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4pre) Gecko/20090922 Fedora/3.0-2.7.b4.fc11 Lightning/1.0pre Thunderbird/3.0b4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Tromey CC: Project Archer Subject: Re: [RFC] PR python/10826 References: <4AE19522.5030206@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2009-q4/txt/msg00042.txt.bz2 On 10/30/2009 10:20 PM, Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>> "Phil" == Phil Muldoon writes: >>>>>> > Phil> I've attached a patch to what I think is the best fix for the PR. > > Phil> What do you think? > > AFAIK, we require gdb commands to flush their output or emit a newline. > Why not also require this of Python scripts? IOW, I think we should > probably just close this as invalid. > > Tom > I updated the bug (and closed it) with a link to these comments, and also a canned command demonstrating the .flush()/new-line output in MI Thanks for the review! http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10826 Cheers, Phil