From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14823 invoked by alias); 20 Jan 2010 08:44:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact archer-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Sender: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Received: (qmail 14813 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Jan 2010 08:44:12 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4B56C254.1060405@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 08:44:00 -0000 From: Chris Moller User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090513 Fedora/3.0-2.3.beta2.fc11 Thunderbird/3.0b2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Tromey CC: Project Archer Subject: Re: vtable? References: <4B4F5C02.8020909@nc.rr.com> <4B55DA8A.30307@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2010-q1/txt/msg00025.txt.bz2 On 01/19/10 17:32, Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>> "Chris" == Chris Moller writes: >>>>>> > > Chris> So the question is whether the right thing to do is fix the gdb a > Chris> priori information hack, or to fix gcc (if necessary--a DWARF dump of > Chris> the testcase shows a lot of information concerning all of the relevant > Chris> classes, but whether it's right or sufficient I don't know) and fix > Chris> gdb properly to use the DWARF info. > > Fix gdb's current approach. Okay, will do. cm > The ABI is pretty stable, and gdb already > uses it for a lot of things. > > Tom >