From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31454 invoked by alias); 12 Feb 2010 15:44:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact archer-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Sender: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Received: (qmail 31440 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Feb 2010 15:44:44 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4B75775D.8040700@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 15:44:00 -0000 From: Sami Wagiaalla User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100120 Fedora/3.0.1-1.fc12 Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Tromey CC: archer@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [rfc] patch for pr8880 References: <4B703D65.302@redhat.com> <4B71B645.2050806@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2010-q1/txt/msg00079.txt.bz2 On 02/11/2010 04:00 PM, Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Tromey writes: > > Tom> c-exp.y does sometimes differentiate the cases; it will emit an > Tom> OP_SCOPE in the qualified case. I think we do mishandle either > Tom> "::name" or "::name::name" here, in the sense that these aren't > Tom> distinguished from a name without a leading "::". > > Sami mentioned that this was handled on expr-cumulative. > > I looked, and it does seem to be partially handled, but I think there > are still bugs. Also, parts of the implementation are bad -- checking > for "::" in lookup_symbol_in_language is a no-no. > > I may end up redoing this; if you're actively working in this area, let > me know, and I will back off. > Sounds good to me. Go for it. Sami