Re: [Archer] Stop the Insanity! Linespec Rewrite

[Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com>]

On 03/06/2012 04:11 PM, Joel Brobecker wrote:
>> I do not think so. That was fast! I will make sure to update my
>> sources and test again ASAP, hopefully this evening or tomorrow.
>
> And I can now confirm that all issues detected by our testsuite
> have been taken care of without introducing new regressions.

Hey, that's great news. Thank you for all your help with testing!

> So, the only change of behavior is the fact that the breakpoint
> command now accepts the "TASK" keyword in addition to "task".

I'm afraid I don't understand. As far as I can tell, CVS HEAD and 
archer-keiths-linespec-rewrite behave identically. The output is exactly 
the same:

$ gdb -nx -q gdb

Reading symbols from 
/home/keiths/sources/gdb/git/virgin/linux/gdb/gdb...done.
(gdb) b main task 3
Cannot inspect Ada tasks when program is not running
(gdb) b main TASK 3
Function "main TASK 3" not defined.
Make breakpoint pending on future shared library load? (y or [n]) n
(gdb) b main
Breakpoint 1 at 0x487143: file ../../gdb/gdb/gdb.c, line 29.
(gdb) r
Starting program: /home/keiths/sources/gdb/git/virgin/linux/gdb/gdb
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
Using host libthread_db library "/lib64/libthread_db.so.1".

Breakpoint 1, main (argc=1, argv=0x7fffffffe0a8) at ../../gdb/gdb/gdb.c:29
29	  memset (&args, 0, sizeof args);
(gdb) b main task 3
Unknown task 3.
(gdb) b main TASK 3
Function "main TASK 3" not defined.
Make breakpoint pending on future shared library load? (y or [n]) n
(gdb)

Am I using this incorrectly?

Keith