From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14714 invoked by alias); 12 Dec 2009 00:13:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact archer-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Sender: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Received: (qmail 14705 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Dec 2009 00:13:09 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <4A7FE28D.4050901@redhat.com> <4A8D8868.3010302@redhat.com> Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 00:13:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC] Proposal for a new DWARF name index section From: Cary Coutant To: Tom Tromey Cc: Dodji Seketeli , "GDB/Archer list" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-System-Of-Record: true X-SW-Source: 2009-q4/txt/msg00095.txt.bz2 > It occurred to me today that we could define a GNU-local attribute that > GCC (and whatever DWARF-rewriting tool we come up with to generate the > indices post-facto) can put into the CU DIE. > > What do you think of that? Sounds fine to me. -cary