From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5292 invoked by alias); 19 Jan 2010 22:33:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact archer-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Sender: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Received: (qmail 5282 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Jan 2010 22:33:06 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org From: Tom Tromey To: Chris Moller Cc: Project Archer Subject: Re: vtable? References: <4B4F5C02.8020909@nc.rr.com> <4B55DA8A.30307@redhat.com> Reply-To: Tom Tromey Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 22:33:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <4B55DA8A.30307@redhat.com> (Chris Moller's message of "Tue, 19 Jan 2010 11:15:06 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2010-q1/txt/msg00024.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Chris" == Chris Moller writes: Chris> So the question is whether the right thing to do is fix the gdb a Chris> priori information hack, or to fix gcc (if necessary--a DWARF dump of Chris> the testcase shows a lot of information concerning all of the relevant Chris> classes, but whether it's right or sufficient I don't know) and fix Chris> gdb properly to use the DWARF info. Fix gdb's current approach. The ABI is pretty stable, and gdb already uses it for a lot of things. Tom