From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6457 invoked by alias); 8 Jun 2011 16:27:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact archer-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Sender: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Received: (qmail 6440 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Jun 2011 16:27:43 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org From: Tom Tromey To: archer@sourceware.org Subject: Re: gdb side of improved linker-debugger interface References: <20110607094808.GB4143@redhat.com> <20110608141239.GE2680@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2011 16:27:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20110608141239.GE2680@redhat.com> (Gary Benson's message of "Wed, 8 Jun 2011 15:12:39 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2011-q2/txt/msg00023.txt.bz2 Gary> I did it that way to ensure we're looking for the probes in the Gary> correct object. It uses the original code to locate _dl_debug_state, Gary> then assumes that the object containing _dl_debug_state is the linker Gary> and looks for the probes in that. I don't know if this is the right Gary> solution though. Ok, I see. I think it would be fine the other way, but this is ok with me too. Tom