From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6208 invoked by alias); 30 Oct 2009 22:21:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact archer-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Sender: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Received: (qmail 6199 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Oct 2009 22:21:04 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org From: Tom Tromey To: Phil Muldoon Cc: Project Archer Subject: Re: [RFC] PR python/10826 References: <4AE19522.5030206@redhat.com> Reply-To: Tom Tromey Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 22:21:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <4AE19522.5030206@redhat.com> (Phil Muldoon's message of "Fri, 23 Oct 2009 12:36:02 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2009-q4/txt/msg00033.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Phil" == Phil Muldoon writes: Phil> I've attached a patch to what I think is the best fix for the PR. Phil> What do you think? AFAIK, we require gdb commands to flush their output or emit a newline. Why not also require this of Python scripts? IOW, I think we should probably just close this as invalid. Tom