From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13974 invoked by alias); 31 May 2011 19:46:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact archer-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Sender: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Received: (qmail 13842 invoked by uid 22791); 31 May 2011 19:46:52 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org From: Tom Tromey To: archer@sourceware.org Cc: Paul Pluzhnikov Subject: Re: Improved linker-debugger interface References: <20110525153649.GB3149@redhat.com> <20110531162428.GB3464@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 19:46:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20110531162428.GB3464@redhat.com> (Gary Benson's message of "Tue, 31 May 2011 17:24:28 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2011-q2/txt/msg00008.txt.bz2 Gary> Is it possible for in-process debuggers to locate SystemTap probes? The probes are described in an non-allocated section, so IIUC they aren't mapped by ld.so. I guess a program could examine the executables and libraries it uses and map them itself. I am not sure how LLTng plans to address this. Tom