From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <archer-return-1989-listarch-archer=sourceware.org@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 10987 invoked by alias); 11 Jun 2010 20:31:56 -0000
Mailing-List: contact archer-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Sender: <archer@sourceware.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:archer@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:archer-help@sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:archer-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Id: <archer.sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 10972 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Jun 2010 20:31:56 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.9 required=5.0
	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: Dodji Seketeli <dodji@redhat.com>
Cc: Project Archer <archer@sourceware.org>, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Fedora 14 debug proposal
References: <m3bpbljm4k.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
	<m34ohcjoz2.fsf@tutu.torimasen.com> <m3wru8dw4s.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
Reply-To: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 20:31:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <m3wru8dw4s.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (Tom Tromey's message of "Wed,
	09 Jun 2010 10:10:59 -0600")
Message-ID: <m3k4q548gf.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-SW-Source: 2010-q2/txt/msg00045.txt.bz2

>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> writes:

Dodji> I guess at worst, upstream will require a flag to get the
Dodji> .debug_{pug,aranges,pubnames,pubtypes} section back for a little
Dodji> while before removing the code completely?

Tom> I wouldn't bother with an option, but then I'm not very concerned about
Tom> whether this particular change goes upstream.  Of course, that is easy
Tom> for me to say -- I will do whatever Jakub thinks is best here.

On irc, Jakub asked for this to be sent upstream, just to see if they
would accept it.  I'm struggling through a regtest, you'll see it on
gcc-patches "soon".

Tom