From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14792 invoked by alias); 1 Nov 2010 21:00:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact archer-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Sender: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Received: (qmail 14779 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Nov 2010 21:00:17 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,TW_BJ,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org From: Tom Tromey To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: archer@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Brief stats for Fedora *.patch merge References: <20101101173626.GA11039@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 21:00:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20101101173626.GA11039@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> (Jan Kratochvil's message of "Mon, 1 Nov 2010 18:36:26 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2010-q4/txt/msg00024.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil writes: Jan> FYI some brief stats on the Fedora trunk merge status. One should Jan> rebase it to 7.2.50.* first for F15=7.3 to rebase the patches to Jan> HEAD before trying to push them to avoid rebasing them possibly Jan> twice. Thanks. Jan> drop vs. push vs. maybepush and whether +work are only a rough Jan> guess of mine. For this specific one: #=maybepush: May get obsoleted by Tom's unrelocated objfiles patch. Patch389: gdb-archer-pie-addons.patch Let's not wait for the split objfile branch. It is on hold for a while, while I think about how to proceed. Also, I think we should pick a day or two in November to have a Fedora patch submit-a-thon. How about, say, Nov 18 and 19? Tom