From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10054 invoked by alias); 2 Feb 2010 23:28:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact archer-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Sender: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Received: (qmail 10043 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Feb 2010 23:28:41 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org From: Tom Tromey To: Chris Moller Cc: Project Archer Subject: Re: patch for pr9067 References: <4B68A35E.2050301@redhat.com> Reply-To: Tom Tromey Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 23:28:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <4B68A35E.2050301@redhat.com> (Chris Moller's message of "Tue, 02 Feb 2010 17:12:46 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2010-q1/txt/msg00046.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Chris" == Chris Moller writes: Chris> I just sent $subject to gdb-patches. Thanks. Chris> Turns out it was simultaneously more complex and simpler than we Chris> both thought: You can't just blindly inhibit multiple printings Chris> of static members. Sometimes it's legitimate, like when they Chris> legitimately appear multiple times, possibly on different paths Chris> through the tree. I didn't see this in the test case you sent. Could you add it? Chris> Not that I'm a big fan of obstacks, but on the Chris> least-tinkering-possible principle, I scrapped my new stuff and Chris> fixed the obstacks. Yeah, that's the right thing to do. Tom