From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3244 invoked by alias); 2 Jun 2011 23:56:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact archer-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Sender: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Received: (qmail 3229 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Jun 2011 23:56:10 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org From: Tom Tromey To: "Frank Ch. Eigler" Cc: archer@sourceware.org, ppluzhnikov@google.com Subject: Re: Improved linker-debugger interface References: <20110601012341.GA7063@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 23:56:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20110601012341.GA7063@redhat.com> (Frank Ch. Eigler's message of "Tue, 31 May 2011 21:23:41 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2011-q2/txt/msg00014.txt.bz2 Frank> It depends. If it's out of the hot path, a five or eight-byte noop Frank> may be OK. Measurements as to the actual impact would help. Considering that this is in dlopen, I am not concerned. It is already making dummy function calls along this path, also for debuggers. Tom