From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23508 invoked by alias); 29 Jun 2011 20:08:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact archer-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Sender: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Received: (qmail 23493 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Jun 2011 20:08:38 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org From: Tom Tromey To: archer@sourceware.org Cc: Yao Qi Subject: Re: C++ draft References: <20110628122135.GB3005@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 20:08:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20110628122135.GB3005@redhat.com> (Gary Benson's message of "Tue, 28 Jun 2011 13:21:35 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2011-q2/txt/msg00039.txt.bz2 Gary> As I understand it, I don't know that there's any reason C++ has to Gary> use more memory than C. Granted there are things like the STL that Gary> generate vastly more code under the hood than you might expect, but Gary> I don't think anybody is talking about using STL here. Actually, I think we do want to use the STL. At the very least it would put us on track to get rid of vec.h, our home-grown std::vector. But we also use or want to use other containers. Tom