From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26608 invoked by alias); 20 Apr 2006 14:24:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 26597 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Apr 2006 14:24:22 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from ac-202-238-16-ind.acmet.com (HELO alice.acmet.com) (61.16.238.202) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Apr 2006 14:24:19 +0000 Received: from amarnath (localhost [127.0.0.1] (may be forged)) by alice.acmet.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k3KETZO12732 for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2006 19:59:36 +0530 From: "Amarnath" To: Subject: Query in MIPS HI and LO relocations Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 14:50:00 -0000 Message-ID: <000201c66486$d17663b0$ad00a8c0@amarnath> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-04/txt/msg00281.txt.bz2 Hi all, I am having a query in the MIPS ABI. As per the SYSTEM V ABI, R_MIPS_HI16 relocation should be immediately followed by its corresponding R_MIPS_LO16. I would like to know whether this is specific to SYSTEM V architecture alone / the linker specification can be changed as per our own architecture. Please help me in understanding this.