From: "David and Jannette Uczen" <uczen@mint.net>
To: "Ian Lance Taylor" <ian@zembu.com>, "H.J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>
Cc: <linas@linas.org>, <binutils@sourceware.cygnus.com>
Subject: Re: IBM S/370 and binutils
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 1999 10:01:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <000a01bf22f8$1abeaa00$c081e3d8@duczen--lap.hannaford.com> (raw)
If EM_I370 is different from Amdahl's ABI, wouldn't it be better to change
i370 to conform to Amdahl's?
--David
-----Original Message-----
From: H.J. Lu <hjl@lucon.org>
To: Ian Lance Taylor <ian@zembu.com>
Cc: linas@linas.org <linas@linas.org>; uczen@mint.net <uczen@mint.net>;
binutils@sourceware.cygnus.com <binutils@sourceware.cygnus.com>
Date: Friday, October 29, 1999 1:05 PM
Subject: Re: IBM S/370 and binutils
>>
>> Talk to registry@sco.com. They maintain the lists of official ELF
>> machine numbers. They'll give you a number if you ask, although
>> sometimes you have to ask a few times. It may help to pull in
>> somebody from IBM; they seem to take big companies more seriously than
>> free software people.
>
>I am looking at the draft of the next SVR4 gABI. 9 is reserved. In the
>previous email from Joel at SCO, it will be used for EM_S370.
>
>>
>> First, though, is there some reason that it is inappropriate to use
>> EM_S370? I don't know anything about the 370, so that may be a stupid
>> question.
>
>Linas, does Linux/i370 use the same ABI as defined by Amdahl's EM_S370?
>If we do, we can use it. Otherwise, we have to apply for a new EM_I370.
>
>
>--
>H.J. Lu (hjl@gnu.org)
>
>
next reply other threads:[~1999-10-30 10:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-10-30 10:01 David and Jannette Uczen [this message]
1999-10-30 10:57 ` linas
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1999-10-30 19:32 David and Jannette Uczen
1999-10-29 18:37 David and Jannette Uczen
1999-10-29 18:27 David and Jannette Uczen
1999-10-29 18:27 David and Jannette Uczen
1999-10-30 11:45 ` linas
1999-10-27 18:40 David and Jannette Uczen
1999-10-27 19:19 ` Alan Modra
1999-10-29 9:12 ` linas
1999-10-29 9:28 ` H.J. Lu
1999-10-29 9:37 ` Ian Lance Taylor
1999-10-29 10:53 ` linas
1999-10-29 9:14 ` linas
1999-10-29 9:22 ` linas
1999-10-29 9:36 ` Ian Lance Taylor
1999-10-29 9:57 ` H.J. Lu
1999-10-29 10:05 ` H.J. Lu
1999-10-27 16:24 David and Jannette Uczen
1999-10-27 16:40 ` Ian Lance Taylor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='000a01bf22f8$1abeaa00$c081e3d8@duczen--lap.hannaford.com' \
--to=uczen@mint.net \
--cc=binutils@sourceware.cygnus.com \
--cc=hjl@lucon.org \
--cc=ian@zembu.com \
--cc=linas@linas.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).