[PATCH] Fix typo in two binutils testsuite test names.

[PATCH] Fix typo in two binutils testsuite test names.

[Dave Korn]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 652 bytes --]



  :)  Well, seeing as we're all looking at copy-?.d, and seeing as today there
seem to be a lot of minor nits and cleanups going in, I noticed that 'setting'
was mis-speeeled.  Does anyone use these names for automated analysis, or
shall we correct it?

  Tested by running the testsuite and seeing that it doesn't go wrong and that
the right text ends up in the sum and log files!


2006-05-02  Dave Korn  <dave.korn@artimi.com>

	* binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/copy-1.d (name):  Correct spelling
	of 'setting'.
	* binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/copy-1.d (name):  Likewise.

    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....

[-- Attachment #2: typo-patch.diff --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 1321 bytes --]

Index: binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/copy-1.d
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/copy-1.d,v
retrieving revision 1.1
diff -p -u -r1.1 copy-1.d
--- binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/copy-1.d	26 Apr 2006 13:37:05 -0000	1.1
+++ binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/copy-1.d	2 May 2006 13:37:07 -0000
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 #PROG: objcopy
 #objdump: -h
 #objcopy: --set-section-flags .post_text_reserve=contents,alloc,load,readonly,code
-#name: copy with seting section flags 1
+#name: copy with setting section flags 1
 
 .*: +file format .*
 
Index: binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/copy-2.d
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/copy-2.d,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -p -u -r1.2 copy-2.d
--- binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/copy-2.d	2 May 2006 12:17:30 -0000	1.2
+++ binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/copy-2.d	2 May 2006 13:37:07 -0000
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 #PROG: objcopy
 #objdump: -h
 #objcopy: --set-section-flags foo=contents,alloc,load,code
-#name: copy with seting section flags 2
+#name: copy with setting section flags 2
 #source: copytest.s
 #not-target: *-*-aout
 # Note - we use copytest.s and a section named "foo" rather

Re: [PATCH] Fix typo in two binutils testsuite test names.

[Nick Clifton]

Hi Dave,

> seem to be a lot of minor nits and cleanups going in, I noticed that 'setting'
> was mis-speeeled.  Does anyone use these names for automated analysis, or
> shall we correct it?

Yes please.

>   Tested by running the testsuite and seeing that it doesn't go wrong and that
> the right text ends up in the sum and log files!
> 
> 
> 2006-05-02  Dave Korn  <dave.korn@artimi.com>
> 
> 	* binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/copy-1.d (name):  Correct spelling
> 	of 'setting'.
> 	* binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/copy-1.d (name):  Likewise.

Approved - please apply.

Cheers
   Nick

RE: [PATCH] Fix typo in two binutils testsuite test names.

[Dave Korn]

On 02 May 2006 16:34, Nick Clifton wrote:

>> 2006-05-02  Dave Korn  <dave.korn@artimi.com>
>> 
>> 	* binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/copy-1.d (name):  Correct spelling
of
>> 'setting'. 
>> 	* binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/copy-1.d (name):  Likewise.
> 
> Approved - please apply.

  Done, but corrected the cut'n'paste typo and reformatted the ChangeLog entry
and adjusted the file paths thusly and applied it to the correct one in the
testsuite subdir:

binutils/testsuite/

2006-05-02  Dave Korn  <dave.korn@artimi.com>

	* binutils-all/copy-1.d (name):  Correct spelling of 'setting'.
	* binutils-all/copy-2.d (name):  Likewise.


    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....