From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-16107-listarch-binutils=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 7729 invoked by alias); 19 Feb 2002 23:27:06 -0000
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 7609 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2002 23:27:04 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO rly-ip01.mx.aol.com) (205.188.156.49)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Feb 2002 23:27:04 -0000
Received: from logs-wf.proxy.aol.com (logs-wf.proxy.aol.com [205.188.195.132])
	  by rly-ip01.mx.aol.com (8.8.8/8.8.8/AOL-5.0.0)
	  with ESMTP id SAA03143 for <binutils@sources.redhat.com>;
	  Tue, 19 Feb 2002 18:26:03 -0500 (EST)
Received: from default-users (AC8A9C24.ipt.aol.com [172.138.156.36])
	by logs-wf.proxy.aol.com (8.10.0/8.10.0) with SMTP id g1JNOL6109816
	for <binutils@sources.redhat.com>; Tue, 19 Feb 2002 18:24:22 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <003801c1b99c$ff353b80$05000006@default-users>
Reply-To: "Randall Hyde" <rhyde@cs.ucr.edu>
From: "Randall Hyde" <rhyde@cs.ucr.edu>
To: <binutils@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Gas Problems
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 16:06:00 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
X-Apparently-From: RHYDEMSCS@aol.com
X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg00725.txt.bz2

Hi, I'm having problems with Gas as
follows:

Note: I'm using .intel_syntax in Gas to process the
output of a compiler I've written (which emits MASM
code, porting it to AT&T syntax is too much of a headache).

Here are some problems I've found:

(1) statements like the following get rejected:
fstp float ptr [eax]
fstp double ptr [eax]
fstp tfloat ptr [eax]

By trial and error I've found appropriate AT&T suffix
that work, but they are inconsistent, especially on the
integer FP instructions.

(2) movq and other MMX ilk that support 64-bit operands
don't allow "qword ptr" ("must have a 64-bit architecture"
or some-such error results).

CMPSD and MOVSD don't assemble (the other string
instructions are fine).


Hope this helps,
Randy Hyde