From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-21366-listarch-binutils=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 10741 invoked by alias); 9 Oct 2002 20:34:53 -0000
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 10721 invoked from network); 9 Oct 2002 20:34:51 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO smtp012.mail.yahoo.com) (216.136.173.32)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 Oct 2002 20:34:51 -0000
Received: from yamaoka-associates-iaf1044943.cust-rtr.pacbell.net (HELO wren) (stephenhuwclarke@67.120.114.18 with login)
  by smtp.mail.vip.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 9 Oct 2002 20:34:51 -0000
Message-ID: <005401c26fd3$5134c2b0$6301a8c0@wren>
From: "Stephen Clarke" <stephen.clarke@earthling.net>
To: "Hans-Peter Nilsson" <hp@bitrange.com>
Cc: "H. J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>,
	<binutils@sources.redhat.com>
References: <Pine.BSF.4.44.0210021943060.34969-100000@dair.pair.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch] sh64: Fix gas testsuite expected output
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2002 13:34:00 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00181.txt.bz2

From: "Hans-Peter Nilsson"
Subject: Re: [Patch] sh64: Fix gas testsuite expected output


> Index: ld/testsuite/ld-sh/sh.exp
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/ld/testsuite/ld-sh/sh.exp,v
> retrieving revision 1.8
> diff -u -c -3 -p -r1.8 sh.exp
> *** ld/testsuite/ld-sh/sh.exp   8 Feb 2002 06:49:55 -0000
> 1.8
> --- ld/testsuite/ld-sh/sh.exp   30 Aug 2002 00:51:57 -0000
> *************** if ![istarget sh*-*-*] {
> *** 25,31 ****
>       return
>   }
> 
> ! if [istarget sh64-*-elf] {
>       # relaxing not supported on sh64 yet.
>       return
>   }
> --- 25,32 ----
>       return
>   }
> 
> ! if { ([istarget sh64-*-elf]
> !       || [istarget sh64*-*-linux*])} {
>       # relaxing not supported on sh64 yet.
>       return
>   }
> 
> I'd rather you tweak the target specifiers on the tests:
> #targets: sh-*-* shl*-*-* shb*-*-*
> in each *.d should suffice.

It turns out that only ld-r-1.d matches
the sh64*-*-linux* target - none of the other *.d match
any linux configuration.

But I'm a bit nervous about the exact change you suggest,
because I thought sh[1234]-linux were supported
targets?

How about the following instead:
Index: ld-r-1.d
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/ld/testsuite/ld-sh/ld-r-1.d,v
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -c -3 -p -r1.3 ld-r-1.d
*** ld-r-1.d 24 Feb 2002 16:44:44 -0000 1.3
--- ld-r-1.d 9 Oct 2002 20:28:27 -0000
***************
*** 4,9 ****
--- 4,10 ----
  #ld: -r -EL
  #readelf: -r -x1 -x2
  #target: sh*-*-elf sh*-*-linux*
+ #notarget: sh64*-*-linux*
  
  # Make sure relocations against global and local symbols with relative and
  # absolute 32-bit relocs don't come out wrong after ld -r.  Remember that




__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More
http://faith.yahoo.com