From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-50317-listarch-binutils=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 1904 invoked by alias); 20 Apr 2007 13:54:36 -0000
Received: (qmail 1858 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Apr 2007 13:54:35 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail.artimi.com (HELO mail.artimi.com) (194.72.81.2)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Apr 2007 14:54:33 +0100
Received: from rainbow ([192.168.8.46]) by mail.artimi.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); 	 Fri, 20 Apr 2007 14:53:59 +0100
From: "Dave Korn" <dave.korn@artimi.com>
To: "'Kai Tietz'" <Kai.Tietz@onevision.com>
Cc: <binutils@sources.redhat.com>, 	"'H. J. Lu'" <hjl@lucon.org>
References: <010001c78350$a472d580$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> <OFA853B2F0.6AD938D1-ONC12572C3.004BE348-C12572C3.004BED10@onevision.de>
Subject: RE: PATCH: windres
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 13:58:00 -0000
Message-ID: <010501c78353$58eba170$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; 	charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
In-Reply-To: <OFA853B2F0.6AD938D1-ONC12572C3.004BE348-C12572C3.004BED10@onevision.de>
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <binutils.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-04/txt/msg00267.txt.bz2

On 20 April 2007 14:49, Kai Tietz wrote:

>>> Do you have may some helpful suggestions or some additons ?
>>=20
>>=20
>>   Accept underscores in identifiers!  (See previous post!)
>=20
> The new lexer is capable for underscores. I missed to mention that.
> May it would be worth to sent the new lexer infront of the update ?
> I think I could separate it easily from the rest of the update.

  That's probably a good idea, multiple smaller patches relating to isolate=
d areas of functionality make for better testability and less risk of break=
age.


    cheers,
      DaveK
--=20
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....