From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-46176-listarch-binutils=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 10792 invoked by alias); 31 May 2006 09:30:43 -0000
Received: (qmail 10766 invoked by uid 22791); 31 May 2006 09:30:40 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail.artimi.com (HELO mail.artimi.com) (217.40.213.68)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 31 May 2006 09:30:01 +0000
Received: from mail.artimi.com ([192.168.1.3]) by mail.artimi.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); 	 Wed, 31 May 2006 10:29:59 +0100
Received: from rainbow ([192.168.1.165]) by mail.artimi.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); 	 Wed, 31 May 2006 10:29:58 +0100
From: "Dave Korn" <dave.korn@artimi.com>
To: <lightran@vtr.net>
Cc: <binutils@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: RE: Failed Dependencies - Binutils
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 15:53:00 -0000
Message-ID: <03a401c68494$c8d471b0$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; 	charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
In-Reply-To: <447491D80001C81F@hudson.vtr.net>
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2006-05/txt/msg00502.txt.bz2

On 30 May 2006 19:28, lightran@vtr.net wrote:

> I?m triying to install oracle 9i database server in mi pc, and the engine
> present a problem while are installing, then i see the metalink for search
> solution for my problem. The solution recomended by oracle is upgrade the
> binutils(the version mencioned in the previous mail).


  That must be very old advice if it's telling you to try 2.10, which was
released 07-Nov-2000!  It was probably telling people there was a bug in 2.9
which affected the installation.  Your system probably already has an
up-to-date binutils, and although very occasionally old bugs are reintroduced,
it's more likely that whatever problem is affecting your installation isn't
the same bug, and that your up-to-date binutils probably already has the fix
for whatever bug that advice was talking about.

  If by any chance your system does have an old version of binutils, go for
the most recent release - 2.16 was the last, and 2.17 is coming up soon.

    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....