From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DC353858D28; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 14:23:06 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 9DC353858D28 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=simark.ca Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=simark.ca Received: from [172.16.0.192] (192-222-143-198.qc.cable.ebox.net [192.222.143.198]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C86661E110; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 10:23:05 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=simark.ca; s=mail; t=1681222986; bh=n+pFXJmVx5/gAMoOoUYTimm59KcmJsicSLN8txtGqgk=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=DzMWQk6gu/S1Y90lFsi/hMcn/ydIqjCYAIyVY62V/71RPAPB4J2CqaZ0S+k45f2LC wXV1vkR6jok08IB4D5zK7CvsODNMlupseSANdCFMrhlHLvv9EfLFp8GHgG4ZGtHyR+ PNWG1y7PacaZBVbePn3blSGNaBvJtdEq4DyKVMEw= Message-ID: <03bbbbff-5bcc-3fa8-a5e9-9b9cbd541f06@simark.ca> Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2023 10:23:05 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.9.1 Subject: Re: RFC: Adding a SECURITY.md document to the Binutils Content-Language: fr To: Nick Clifton , Eli Zaretskii Cc: binutils@sourceware.org, siddhesh@gotplt.org, gdb@sourceware.org References: <1c38b926-e003-0e21-e7f1-3d5dbec2aabf@redhat.com> <838rf4ou73.fsf@gnu.org> From: Simon Marchi In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,MEDICAL_SUBJECT,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On 4/11/23 09:29, Nick Clifton via Gdb wrote: > Hi Eli, > >> Thanks. A minor nit: does it have to be a .md file? Can it be a .txt >> file instead? > > Sure - no problem. In fact until you asked I just assumed that .md == .txt. > But I see no need for any markup capabilities so using .txt files is fine with me. FWIW, I like .md files, they read well as just text, but are also displayed nicely when viewed in contexts like git web views. I don't see any downsides to using it. Simon