From: WANG Xuerui <i.swmail@xen0n.name>
To: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>,
mengqinggang <mengqinggang@loongson.cn>,
binutils@sourceware.org
Cc: xuchenghua@loongson.cn, chenglulu@loongson.cn,
liuzhensong@loongson.cn, i.swmail@xen0n.name, maskray@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] LoongArch: Fix pcaddi format string
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2023 11:08:00 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <06b6500e-6e0c-c210-ad8d-afc913f5aa79@xen0n.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <548af2c302efcdb23ae3bedd7249db9e618930be.camel@xry111.site>
On 2023/8/9 19:37, Xi Ruoyao wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-08-09 at 09:39 +0800, mengqinggang wrote:
>> Add "<<2" for pcaddi format string
>> ---
>> opcodes/loongarch-opc.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/opcodes/loongarch-opc.c b/opcodes/loongarch-opc.c
>> index 2f02e33dbec..7d110683e93 100644
>> --- a/opcodes/loongarch-opc.c
>> +++ b/opcodes/loongarch-opc.c
>> @@ -564,7 +564,7 @@ static struct loongarch_opcode loongarch_imm_opcodes[] =
>> { 0x10000000, 0xfc000000, "addu16i.d", "r0:5,r5:5,s10:16", 0, 0, 0, 0 },
>> { 0x14000000, 0xfe000000, "lu12i.w", "r0:5,s5:20", 0, 0, 0, 0 },
>> { 0x16000000, 0xfe000000, "lu32i.d", "r0:5,s5:20", 0, 0, 0, 0 },
>> - { 0x18000000, 0xfe000000, "pcaddi", "r0:5,s5:20", 0, 0, 0, 0 },
>> + { 0x18000000, 0xfe000000, "pcaddi", "r0:5,s5:20<<2", 0, 0, 0, 0 },
>
> The Linux kernel already uses things like "pcaddi t0, 4". To me this
> change will break them completely, and fixing it on the kernel side will
> be difficult (we'll need to create some nasty gas version check).
Thanks for the heads-up, I initially was inclined to accept this patch
but was hindered by real life, then saw this. The asymmetry is
unfortunately real and here to stay, because in this case code would be
broken without any build-time errors or warnings, and such breakage
would go unnoticed until the moment the wrong instruction gets executed.
> So I don't think we should make such a backward incompatible change
> without a very compelling reason. You may argue that "<<2" has a better
> readability, but if we really need the readability we can write
>
> pcaddi t0, 4 # << 2
>
> in the code anyway.
The immediate operand means "delta in # of instructions":
> pcaddi t0, 4 # insns
Which is *arguably more* intuitive than the new semantics implied by
"<<2", since IMO it's more natural to think in terms of instruction
words when we talk about PC-relative tricks with instruction fetch in mind.
IMO a better way forward could be to document this wart in an upcoming
revision of the LoongArch ISA manual. (It already contains assembler
syntax tips for insns like alsl.* so another similar addition should be
appropriate.) It's not sure at this moment whether an overhaul of
LoongArch assembler is going to happen, so we have little choice if we
want to keep downstream fuss to a minimum.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-11 3:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-09 1:39 [PATCH v1 0/2] Add support for "pcaddi rd, label" mengqinggang
2023-08-09 1:39 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] LoongArch: Fix pcaddi format string mengqinggang
2023-08-09 11:37 ` Xi Ruoyao
2023-08-09 11:48 ` Xi Ruoyao
2023-08-11 3:08 ` WANG Xuerui [this message]
2023-08-15 10:00 ` mengqinggang
2023-08-15 10:44 ` Xi Ruoyao
2023-08-15 11:35 ` mengqinggang
2023-08-15 15:03 ` Xi Ruoyao
2023-08-09 1:39 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] LoongArch: Add support for "pcaddi rd, label" mengqinggang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=06b6500e-6e0c-c210-ad8d-afc913f5aa79@xen0n.name \
--to=i.swmail@xen0n.name \
--cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
--cc=chenglulu@loongson.cn \
--cc=liuzhensong@loongson.cn \
--cc=maskray@google.com \
--cc=mengqinggang@loongson.cn \
--cc=xry111@xry111.site \
--cc=xuchenghua@loongson.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).