From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf1-x432.google.com (mail-pf1-x432.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::432]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B95F3858D32 for ; Mon, 3 Oct 2022 04:04:36 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 8B95F3858D32 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Received: by mail-pf1-x432.google.com with SMTP id v186so9158909pfv.11 for ; Sun, 02 Oct 2022 21:04:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=Z+OmlpR8NzUS+uSfl5MlGmJYL63INT7x9afb4sqeG8E=; b=XGwWDiJQPjx78lVE8KnjHydJUCkYz31rEnSswu+TmXMW5326dMUEHOA15sFzFPBgxY PeppPfqD6etg1ku4EpEoQKGWHJYVVttL9vhiU54knk9WfA0HZe0+3SM5w6pmlG6Zw3iz AwvkZ61pT/J2enhLUL/zMaQ4zSh3S5Ko1fa9RIbZjp8wPyJo2FvV/t2LrhY8h819sbsD B143+Py1HuRCXsjmUJB3EOA7hzjKIoySuMhqdawatDbcmg6qNDZvywoQnwGCzAqjfUYp sHPEwFy9ZaxcV/bGEelGHvz8rk48b2fw9f6gwX6opddePIKq/4ZDbn2qhUSiS6eukVOK GXLw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=Z+OmlpR8NzUS+uSfl5MlGmJYL63INT7x9afb4sqeG8E=; b=n/+KawlPwgYAlPbEY8feXqXM0DFXOP998qfR7oNNmaENxft0R3uo2zkbLcVEozQ7JI gKLmdYvquxFz8P9f2PVyrdisPi+d7w7p1lW+EqCAhGsPqNR8Ks4QIqFkSJWqHgdZYTxP /jXC4RxU4Oh4sci9Ormmz9yYsiOYdvtx33cOeGC0yK5pNZpKu2hqh5TQSyyuLZb6Dkiu Kev1JxS8cyJC+RxUTikZGUY4eYMiaEqBD5+po3QxhB8sVsL3B2FCDQSu3NVVT3NSiRui /fHUdJ/tzqJ9/XO172FJ9KJMe3eU+JJLt1ip468B+JQ1mQl8Oicxi5e2UHPY+UEkir3Q 21jw== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf30VmDvQHwrc1jyQ3YfGuuBuyPogfdJqlAgpvyX9TrC9ZFodVvF jKVFlomqXJri3/JY4u138R0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM65Rc7onsqpNa+Gdfj9/1ondkXRYTr9RKXeVapinPYAJ1yuw7GeW3hvlg1f1JVmEywiWRLXGQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:1951:b0:54d:a413:7c68 with SMTP id s17-20020a056a00195100b0054da4137c68mr20682404pfk.10.1664769875394; Sun, 02 Oct 2022 21:04:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2601:681:8600:13d0::f0a? ([2601:681:8600:13d0::f0a]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w1-20020a170902d10100b001785dddc703sm6046319plw.120.2022.10.02.21.04.34 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 02 Oct 2022 21:04:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <0805e6c5-18fa-3ce7-d1ad-5cfd486baf66@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2022 22:04:33 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.3.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] RISC-V psABI: Assign DWARF register numbers to vector registers Content-Language: en-US To: Nelson Chu Cc: binutils@sourceware.org References: <874jwni91f.fsf@redhat.com> <7cea93e7-f75b-2d5a-d63b-73288d4b3e5e@gmail.com> From: Jeff Law In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On 10/2/22 19:36, Nelson Chu wrote: > On Sun, Oct 2, 2022 at 11:59 PM Jeff Law via Binutils > wrote: >> On 10/1/22 14:27, Andrew Burgess via Binutils wrote: >>> I can't approve binutils patches, but as this mentioned RISC-V and >>> DWARF, both of which I'm interested in, I took a look :) >>> >>> Both these patches look good to me. The register numbers align with the >>> spec, and the test makes sense. >> Well, that's the key property -- they align with the spec. >> >> >> I'm also not sure if I can approve for binutils, but if I can, OK for >> the trunk ;-) > Thanks for your help, Andrew and Jeff! > > Hi Jeff, > > Of course! You are a global maintainer of both gcc and binutils. > Welcome and please feel free to approve any RISC-V binutils patch if > you are free and the patch looks good to you :-) I may be listed as a global maintainer for binutils, but I haven't done much in this space in years and I'm cognizant that there's already a group of folks (yourself included) working together on RISC-V bits.   I don't want to step on anyones toes, but I also want to help share the load. Jeff