From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4099 invoked by alias); 2 Feb 2012 16:28:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 4072 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Feb 2012 16:28:20 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-yw0-f41.google.com (HELO mail-yw0-f41.google.com) (209.85.213.41) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Feb 2012 16:28:01 +0000 Received: by yhoo22 with SMTP id o22so1388078yho.0 for ; Thu, 02 Feb 2012 08:28:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.9.33 with SMTP id 21mr5374626yhs.39.1328200080868; Thu, 02 Feb 2012 08:28:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from Deathwish.hagood ([74.221.200.84]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h29sm6521711ann.16.2012.02.02.08.27.59 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 02 Feb 2012 08:27:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (Deathwish [127.0.0.1]) by Deathwish.hagood (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B703C7B8044; Thu, 2 Feb 2012 10:27:58 -0600 (CST) Received: from deathwish ([127.0.0.1]) (SquirrelMail authenticated user wowbaggr) by localhost with HTTP; Thu, 2 Feb 2012 10:27:58 -0600 Message-ID: <098d5826f7b6f8520ee6b9359e939f87.squirrel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20120202104445.GF392@e103070-lin.arm.com> References: <35a37ea957466b2f7a770e7978aebfef.squirrel@localhost> <20120202104445.GF392@e103070-lin.arm.com> Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 16:28:00 -0000 Subject: Re: Strange ARM issue: wrong exception table type? From: david.hagood@gmail.com To: "david.hagood@gmail.com" , "binutils@sourceware.org" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.21 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-02/txt/msg00014.txt.bz2 > David, > If possible can you provide the assembler source and the output of readelf > -u on both object files? Send via direct mail so that I don't get yelled at for sending a tarball to the list. You've suggested trying the latest head - is there an already built version you'd like me to try - because I've had a devil of a time building the full toolchain from the head tarballs of GCC and binutils.