From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4476 invoked by alias); 1 Sep 2009 01:02:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 4273 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Sep 2009 01:02:12 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,J_CHICKENPOX_92,STOX_REPLY_TYPE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.accesssoftek.com (HELO mail.accesssoftek.com) (63.145.236.71) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 01:02:07 +0000 Received: from andreic6e7fe55 (67.102.105.77) by mail.accesssoftek.com (172.16.0.71) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.1.393.1; Mon, 31 Aug 2009 18:01:19 -0700 Message-ID: <0A6E7977A8F4472A81072AD546E79C6E@andreic6e7fe55> From: Viktor Kutuzov To: References: <7ebec9e70908130809n1eadef26o479906b6e228caea@mail.gmail.com><33D126FC21A4401492D88E8D464241C7@andreic6e7fe55><45333C62A387488E9C744D87C5BDF4C5@andreic6e7fe55> Subject: Re: Gold: Testsuite Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2009 01:02:00 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00004.txt.bz2 Thanks, Ian, I'm looking at the configure.ac. The idea is to have a set of asm files and "correct" obj dumps to compare the result with (I'd prefer to keep all dependencies inside binutils as much as reasonable). Is there a "standard" directory structure for the platform specific filees? Should I create a new "arm" directory under the gold/testsuite and place everything there? Best regards, Viktor ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ian Lance Taylor" To: "Viktor Kutuzov" Cc: Sent: Monday, August 31, 2009 5:46 PM Subject: Re: Gold: Testsuite Viktor Kutuzov writes: > Sorry for a dumb question. > I'm trying to figure out how to use the gold testsuite for platform-specific things. > It doesn't seem like it fits well. > > Could anyone point me to any existing and working unit test for any platform-dependent reallocation, please? It's not a dumb question. There are two ways to approach this. The first is to see if there is any to generate the relocation using ordinary C code. If so, write a test case in C which verifies that it does the right thing, or simply extend the existing basic_test.cc. basic_test.cc tests various different cases, but it does not test different type sizes. If the relocation can not be generated using ordinary C code, then you have to use AM_CONDITIONAL in configure.ac to generate a new Makefile conditional, and test it in testsuite/Makefile.am to control use of an assembler test case. Ian