From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from xry111.site (xry111.site [89.208.246.23]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76E493858D38 for ; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 11:02:20 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 76E493858D38 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=xry111.site Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xry111.site ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 76E493858D38 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=89.208.246.23 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1706266942; cv=none; b=oU/LZ/MhhNeWRkbTdGtLKwTakblAFuz70yuJtyZHlQ9UfdJsgmvC2EqFk8lyGKe/CMPLM5UUGjZzpnoimvje1sFrvKl6lIZk5aCNoYsoHpP9NgBixH+JLVM5sfIiTl8XOvXx8atiNnBi9KVuWHHghCfZ0lvCN951pkFnmMZlAl0= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1706266942; c=relaxed/simple; bh=psTC5Dxh1qF+C2Rbir107tt/9JpKVxqmNBYqvOzylfI=; h=DKIM-Signature:Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Date:MIME-Version; b=FM64JgtLrmMAUEV1GeYCduWfS+FQLZ/BUXehmwOsp2maZTUJwROkir+LvO5Pg9jytxczKKe2JCbbTUGC3+pKKw3upn4sHlYLFMotF8xesyFVXYVqbL4GgaBkUz+QvVUyeFlH8HK0TynaXoSwlU0rFJUB0MxESWdBKwsPm0+g6FA= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=xry111.site; s=default; t=1706266939; bh=psTC5Dxh1qF+C2Rbir107tt/9JpKVxqmNBYqvOzylfI=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=iiA39lsULAuHrCfKEeWJdUDy4s1vOiDna6BYkY5HpPOVtSsB5Efk1EfzhgEqFyOIC pL8/uIAlVysIoxpInmsxpezMcdKOQEBOvaNnpSswRQaZecHlmeRY8DyoxvibxlD4sT Ek6y6809dHLmZzSixJD/mqVsYxAhmH69E9vyVFcc= Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:683e::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature ECDSA (P-384)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: xry111@xry111.site) by xry111.site (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 37380659A0; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 06:02:16 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <0e9da3c59573e61105e26edd35fb9dca095e5d07.camel@xry111.site> Subject: Re: [PATCH] LoongArch: Fix a bug of getting relocation type From: Xi Ruoyao To: Nick Clifton , mengqinggang Cc: binutils@sourceware.org Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 19:02:14 +0800 In-Reply-To: References: <20240126033932.3577932-1-mengqinggang@loongson.cn> Autocrypt: addr=xry111@xry111.site; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata=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 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.50.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,LIKELY_SPAM_FROM,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Fri, 2024-01-26 at 10:55 +0000, Nick Clifton wrote: > Hi mengqinggang, >=20 > > This patch and > >=20 > > 969f5c0e1=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 LoongArch: gas: Add supp= ort for s9 register > > a0aa6f4ab=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 LoongArch: ld: Add suppo= rt for TLS LE symbol with addend > >=20 > > need to apply to 2.42 branch. >=20 > Applied. >=20 > I am hoping that this is the last of these as I am planning on creating t= he > release on Monday, and I am always worried that last minute changes will > bring in new bugs rather than fix old ones... Pity that we still have the __thread vs. -mcmodel=3Dextreme issue (https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2024-January/132120.html and all the following discussion) not resolved yet. Possible to apply my straightforward (stupid) "fix" for 2.42 if a proper fix cannot be made soon? --=20 Xi Ruoyao School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University