From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18599 invoked by alias); 15 Jul 2002 20:18:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 18589 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2002 20:18:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO potter.sfbay.redhat.com) (205.180.83.107) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 15 Jul 2002 20:18:16 -0000 Received: from localhost.localdomain (remus.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.252]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g6FKIjQ16708; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 13:18:45 -0700 Subject: Re: RFC & patch: Rework MIPS command-line handling From: Eric Christopher To: Thiemo Seufer Cc: Richard Sandiford , "Maciej W. Rozycki" , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, binutils@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20020715195043.GE16056@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> References: <20020715195043.GE16056@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 13:31:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1026764196.1545.24.camel@ghostwheel.cygnus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg00345.txt.bz2 > > 1. Stick with the idea in the patch I sent. Selecting a 64-bit > > processor would usually select the 64-bit EABI, but adding > > -mgp32 forces the 32-bit version. > > > > 2. Reverse of (1). You get the 32-bit version of the EABI > > unless you use -mgp64. > > > > 3. Add eabi32, eabi64, meabi32 and meabi64 to -mabi. You get > > the 32-bit version unless you use -mabi=eabi64. > > I would prefer the third option. At least it makes explicit > what's going on and does not interfere with other ABIs. It _does_ make it explicit, however, there aren't really two different ABIs... -eric -- I will not grease the monkey bars