From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6521 invoked by alias); 15 May 2003 02:14:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 6446 invoked from network); 15 May 2003 02:14:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 15 May 2003 02:14:04 -0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (nat-pool-rdu-dmz.redhat.com [172.16.52.200] (may be forged)) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4F2E3H28130 for ; Wed, 14 May 2003 22:14:03 -0400 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4F2E2T24760; Wed, 14 May 2003 22:14:02 -0400 Received: from dhcp-172-16-25-164.sfbay.redhat.com (dhcp-172-16-25-164.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.25.164]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4F2E2M22463; Wed, 14 May 2003 19:14:02 -0700 Subject: Re: check mips abi x linker emulation compatibility From: Eric Christopher To: Alexandre Oliva Cc: Richard Sandiford , Thiemo Seufer , binutils@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: References: <20030324013532.GA1769@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> <1052325824.19883.0.camel@ghostwheel.sfbay.redhat.com> <1052327219.19883.2.camel@ghostwheel.sfbay.redhat.com> <1052959183.4910.50.camel@ghostwheel.sfbay.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1052964841.23255.0.camel@ghostwheel.sfbay.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 02:14:00 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00452.txt.bz2 > Note that my proposal is orthogonal to the no-abi thing. I'm talking > about having a flag that will let the assembler figure the ABI out all > by itself, instead of following whatever default the target triplet > introduced. Oh. Sure. Follow the gcc one. :) -eric -- Eric Christopher