public inbox for binutils@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Earnshaw <Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com>
To: Ian Lance Taylor <ian@wasabisystems.com>
Cc: Zack Weinberg <zack@codesourcery.com>,
	hp@bitrange.com, schwab@suse.de, binutils@sources.redhat.com,
	Philip Blundell <pb@nexus.co.uk>
Subject: Re: demand_empty_rest_of_line and ignore_rest_of_line
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 11:43:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1083063340.14083.34.camel@pc960.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3d65u3x99.fsf@gossamer.airs.com>

On Tue, 2004-04-27 at 04:39, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> You left
> out the truly dreadful ARM .symver, in which '@' starts a comment at
> any time--except when it appears in the operand of .symver.  And,
> repeating myself, MRI mode.

I'd dearly like to deprecate use of '@' as a comment char, but it's not
trivial.  There simply is no single char in ASCII (with the possible
exception of '`') that can be used as a substitute and that doesn't have
other uses in the syntax.

One possibility would be to adopt a 2-character sequence (such as '//'),
and to that extent I notice that there is already code in the parser to
handle this.

However, there's still the legacy issue.  Old versions of gcc generate @
in abundance, and there is substantial hand-written assembly code out
there that does similarly.  One way of addressing this might be to
reject '@' in the EABI conforming modes -- it provides a relatively
clean cut-off point.  Can the selection of comment characters be made
command-line option dependent?

R.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-04-27 10:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-03-17 16:36 Nathan Sidwell
2004-03-17 16:43 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2004-03-17 16:49 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2004-03-18 10:29   ` Nathan Sidwell
2004-03-18 13:15     ` Ian Lance Taylor
2004-04-23 23:15     ` Andreas Schwab
2004-04-24 17:36       ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2004-04-24 17:57         ` Andreas Schwab
2004-04-24 18:26           ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2004-04-24 19:22             ` Andreas Schwab
2004-04-24 21:31               ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2004-04-24 21:33                 ` Andreas Schwab
2004-04-24 23:25                   ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2004-04-24 23:37                     ` Andreas Schwab
2004-04-25  0:03                     ` Zack Weinberg
2004-04-25  0:22                       ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2004-04-26  0:28                         ` Zack Weinberg
2004-04-26  0:58                           ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2004-04-26  2:14                             ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2004-04-25 23:35                       ` Ian Lance Taylor
2004-04-26  0:51                         ` Zack Weinberg
2004-04-26  2:46                           ` Ian Lance Taylor
2004-04-26  3:13                             ` Zack Weinberg
2004-04-26 14:16                               ` Ian Lance Taylor
2004-04-26 14:22                                 ` Andreas Schwab
2004-04-26 14:34                                   ` Richard Earnshaw
2004-04-26 15:29                                     ` Ian Lance Taylor
2004-04-26 19:26                                       ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2004-04-26 19:42                                 ` Kai Henningsen
2004-04-26 19:45                                   ` Ian Lance Taylor
2004-04-26 20:04                                     ` Ian Lance Taylor
2004-04-27  1:32                                 ` Zack Weinberg
2004-04-27  2:02                                   ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2004-04-27  2:38                                     ` Zack Weinberg
2004-04-27  2:35                                   ` Alan Modra
2004-04-27  3:13                                     ` Zack Weinberg
2004-04-27  4:33                                       ` Ian Lance Taylor
2004-04-27  5:19                                         ` Zack Weinberg
2004-04-27  6:52                                           ` Ian Lance Taylor
2004-04-27 11:43                                         ` Richard Earnshaw [this message]
2004-04-27  2:47                                   ` Ian Lance Taylor

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1083063340.14083.34.camel@pc960.cambridge.arm.com \
    --to=richard.earnshaw@arm.com \
    --cc=binutils@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=hp@bitrange.com \
    --cc=ian@wasabisystems.com \
    --cc=pb@nexus.co.uk \
    --cc=schwab@suse.de \
    --cc=zack@codesourcery.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).