From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0DC2385801B for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2022 13:53:37 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org F0DC2385801B Received: from mail-wm1-f70.google.com (mail-wm1-f70.google.com [209.85.128.70]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-524-0-1lnU-rOJiYTknVna1xLA-1; Fri, 04 Mar 2022 08:53:33 -0500 X-MC-Unique: 0-1lnU-rOJiYTknVna1xLA-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f70.google.com with SMTP id l13-20020a7bcf0d000000b0038982c6bf8fso419114wmg.7 for ; Fri, 04 Mar 2022 05:53:33 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent :content-language:to:references:from:subject:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=sfVWM9mbSVBFdoQUZJPlksYFS5wb9Dcl+Q1INjf1/uM=; b=ubp3CsRgQZ6pTudoj9o5JNjGDlU3oeGoI1wAOe1OAuAYNkdEIxqmnqUtFxNsChPyFw frWvbeX66MB6omzzYamc7wztDf5CMGNF4hZ7xHeXy9Mb9a8n094FmVUKBsn73wND5rBC DjGJuNh+Jo/czcKABYNYIY9HC31k5gbhqOsDH9Rur7HML+60rRSZxXmFpKUo0WlS8yEK C8Zb3tL9NmjJVIZt945hqFfhcKvjmnja+yiL+ZloKXWjYdZan7PALVH4ldvGm8KCBUH3 ibh9diGf4JcIIWS4AYXeogOHWW4K9NKdrBlevF8IP0CXT7JesjgWn/PJF+bhddbBLBkl Woiw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533LEiVJhGL9TU0IXqqEl6cX9MgIZI778mSDkmsuqTRYnIVc5Y/u ke4zSeQXKeExuRpauQEHf+fQnqn9kkgLJzcfc7iQyHpsei9GXtxUMuhDvgwnd5HRpoiGvH4eur9 mj6gy0ZFuC4DogdQS/Q== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4089:0:b0:1f0:4819:61ba with SMTP id o9-20020a5d4089000000b001f0481961bamr7987201wrp.307.1646402011958; Fri, 04 Mar 2022 05:53:31 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx6gVq3oPMl45VRv5JJDUcOpaDV1B1xD2nfqkEJar29gJyD6xdcjfit46QXdERTmtVaS/aQjA== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4089:0:b0:1f0:4819:61ba with SMTP id o9-20020a5d4089000000b001f0481961bamr7987183wrp.307.1646402011695; Fri, 04 Mar 2022 05:53:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.6] (adsl-2-solo-173-39.claranet.co.uk. [80.168.173.39]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 2-20020a1c1902000000b00380d3873d6asm5005389wmz.43.2022.03.04.05.53.31 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 04 Mar 2022 05:53:31 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <10dfd732-9930-22c6-6385-28aa41cd1816@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2022 13:53:30 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.5.0 To: Vladimir Mezentsev , binutils@sourceware.org References: <7dadb881-ab4b-de4a-0453-6d8661a8cd83@oracle.com> <44e0ca3c-0792-7fc2-bff4-0918f1f4bea2@redhat.com> <653282db-9261-e5fc-4280-0d00be272d81@oracle.com> <53d65dfe-38b4-7a2c-2052-b3c039642392@redhat.com> From: Nick Clifton Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] gprofng: a new GNU profiler In-Reply-To: X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-GB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: binutils@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Binutils mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2022 13:53:39 -0000 Hi Vladimir, >  We have pushed these changes here: >     url: https://github.com/oracle/binutils-gdb.git/ >     branch: oracle/gprofng-v4-1 OK, so using those sources, I built a set of the binutils binaries without any special configuration options, ie: configure -- quiet and then I built gprofng and the other binutils tools. This worked OK, but when I tried to run the gprofng testsuite only a few tests appeared to run: Running gprofng/testsuite/gprofng.display/display.exp ... ERROR: compilation of test program in jsynprog failed === gprofng Summary === # of expected passes 14 # of unresolved testcases 1 Which does not look right. But then I remembered that I needed to enable shared builds, so I tried: configure --quiet --enable-shared and this produced even worse test results: Running gprofng/testsuite/gprofng.display/display.exp ... ERROR: compilation of test program in jsynprog failed ERROR: compilation of test program in mttest failed ERROR: compilation of test program in mttest failed ERROR: compilation of test program in mttest failed ERROR: compilation of test program in mttest failed ERROR: compilation of test program in mttest failed ERROR: compilation of test program in mttest failed ERROR: compilation of test program in mttest failed ERROR: compilation of test program in synprog failed ERROR: compilation of test program in synprog failed ERROR: compilation of test program in synprog failed ERROR: compilation of test program in synprog failed ERROR: compilation of test program in synprog failed ERROR: compilation of test program in synprog failed ERROR: compilation of test program in synprog failed === gprofng Summary === # of unresolved testcases 15 The jsynprog and synprog failures is probably expected, since I do not have the JDK installed, but the mttest compilation fails because I am not testing an installed version of gprofng: /dev/shm/delme/gprofng/gprofng/tmpdir/root/usr/local/bin/gprofng: error while loading shared libraries: libgprofng.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory It would be really nice if I could test a built-but-not-installed version of the sources.... Cheers Nick