From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-36481-listarch-binutils=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 30080 invoked by alias); 16 Nov 2004 09:58:15 -0000
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 29704 invoked from network); 16 Nov 2004 09:57:55 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com) (193.131.176.58)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 16 Nov 2004 09:57:55 -0000
Received: from pc960.cambridge.arm.com (pc960.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.205.4])
	by cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iAG9vBso023355;
	Tue, 16 Nov 2004 09:57:11 GMT
Received: from pc960.cambridge.arm.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by pc960.cambridge.arm.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id iAG9vqgK027645;
	Tue, 16 Nov 2004 09:57:52 GMT
Received: (from rearnsha@localhost)
	by pc960.cambridge.arm.com (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id iAG9vph2027643;
	Tue, 16 Nov 2004 09:57:51 GMT
X-Authentication-Warning: pc960.cambridge.arm.com: rearnsha set sender to rearnsha@gcc.gnu.org using -f
Subject: Re: PATCH: Correct handling of R_ARM_TARGET2 in
	elf32_arm_relocate_section
From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@gcc.gnu.org>
To: Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
Cc: binutils@sources.redhat.com
In-Reply-To: <200411160248.iAG2mEji007731@sirius.codesourcery.com>
References: <200411160248.iAG2mEji007731@sirius.codesourcery.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Organization: GNU
Message-Id: <1100599070.25423.33.camel@pc960.cambridge.arm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 09:58:00 -0000
X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00236.txt.bz2

On Tue, 2004-11-16 at 02:48, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> We got spurious warnings about uses of the R_ARM_TARGET2 relocation
> because we forgot to translate it into the real underlying relocation
> in elf32_arm_relocate_section.
> 
> OK?
> 
> --
> Mark Mitchell
> CodeSourcery, LLC
> mark@codesourcery.com
> 
> 2004-11-15  Mark Mitchell  <mark@codesourcery.com>
> 
> 	* elf32-arm.c (elf32_arm_relocate_section): Use
> 	arm_real_reloc_type.


This is OK.

And Daniel is right, this is elf32-arm.c, and it only supports the 'new'
(!OLD_ARM_ABI) ABI.

I haven't seen a patch yet to delete the ifdefs (or if there's been one,
I missed it).

R.