From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21232 invoked by alias); 17 Nov 2004 17:39:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 21147 invoked from network); 17 Nov 2004 17:39:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com) (193.131.176.58) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 17 Nov 2004 17:39:18 -0000 Received: from pc960.cambridge.arm.com (pc960.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.205.4]) by cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iAHHcSso029266; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 17:38:28 GMT Received: from pc960.cambridge.arm.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pc960.cambridge.arm.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id iAHHdAgK023241; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 17:39:10 GMT Received: (from rearnsha@localhost) by pc960.cambridge.arm.com (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id iAHHdAsf023239; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 17:39:10 GMT X-Authentication-Warning: pc960.cambridge.arm.com: rearnsha set sender to rearnsha@gcc.gnu.org using -f Subject: Re: RFA: Support for Thumb in dynamic objects From: Richard Earnshaw To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: binutils@sources.redhat.com, Paul Brook In-Reply-To: <20041117173346.GA1938@nevyn.them.org> References: <20041116233909.GA31434@nevyn.them.org> <1100699286.22014.14.camel@pc960.cambridge.arm.com> <20041117164853.GA512@nevyn.them.org> <1100710750.22014.50.camel@pc960.cambridge.arm.com> <20041117170534.GA1189@nevyn.them.org> <1100711480.22014.59.camel@pc960.cambridge.arm.com> <20041117173346.GA1938@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: GNU Message-Id: <1100713149.23221.0.camel@pc960.cambridge.arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 17:39:00 -0000 X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00257.txt.bz2 On Wed, 2004-11-17 at 17:33, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > It's hard to come up with a good name for manipulation that's basically > unnecessary. It's trying to do two 32-bit reads if possible instead of > a bunch of smaller reads; we could leave this to the client instead. > > This patch calls it WORD_ADDRESS, since that descrbes the use. It > could be throttled down to read 2-byte pieces for Thumb, and to do the > read later (i.e. when we see a bl/blx); I'll leave that for another > day. OK? Yes, thanks. R.